Oxford University study reveals presidential battle of the bots on Twitter

Default Image

So, apparently pro-Trump Twitter bots are a thing. The University of Oxford study, reported by the BBC, revealed that while Trump may have looked popular on Twitter following the September 26 debate, more than half a million (576,178 / 32.7%) of all pro-Trump posts made the evening of the debate and during the next four days were made by bots.

That’s not to say that Hillary Clinton didn’t have her own team of bots rallying for her cause. But, the study found that her bot brigade Tweeted just 136,639 times during the same period.

However, the research did reveal that even when bot activity was filtered out, Trump still remained dominant on Twitter. Furthermore, researchers are keen to emphasis that the results may not be precise due to filtering that could have identified genuine accounts as bots. Identification of bots partially relied on a high Tweet volume (200 times during the researched time period or an average of 50 times a day).

However, as Caroline Sinders, ex-IBM researcher who now works for Buzzfeed told the BBC, “Real people can write a script and use an algorithm to tweet regularly with specific responses, or humans can tweet content that looks almost identical to a series of bots flooding a political hashtag. Also, political commentators or people eagerly engaged in the political debate could also tweet this many times.”

Share:
Share

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Kristina Knight-1
Kristina Knight, Journalist , BA
Content Writer & Editor
linkedin
Kristina Knight is a freelance writer with more than 15 years of experience writing on varied topics. Kristina’s focus for the past 10 years has been the small business, online marketing, and banking sectors, however, she keeps things interesting by writing about her experiences as an adoptive mom, parenting, and education issues. Kristina’s work has appeared with BizReport.com, NBC News, Soaps.com, DisasterNewsNetwork, and many more publications.